If you are evaluating Private vs public company in Nepal, you are already thinking strategically. Structure determines control, compliance burden, capital flexibility, and long-term exit options. For foreign companies entering Nepal, this decision is not just legal. It is commercial.
Nepal sits between two economic giants, India and China. It offers competitive labor costs, improving infrastructure, and access to regional trade routes. But your legal vehicle will shape how effectively you leverage that advantage.
This guide breaks down everything foreign investors need to know. We cover ownership limits, regulatory requirements, tax considerations, foreign direct investment (FDI) approvals, and strategic trade positioning. You will leave with clarity on which structure aligns with your objectives.
Foreign investment in Nepal is governed by the Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer Act (FITTA) 2019 and the Companies Act 2006 (2063). Regulatory oversight includes the Department of Industry (DOI) and the Office of Company Registrar (OCR).
Your company type affects:
It also affects how comfortable international partners and banks feel working with you.
In trade and cross-border investment, structure equals credibility.
Under the Companies Act 2006 (2063):
A private company:
A public company:
For companies seeking stock exchange listing, the relevant authority is the Nepal Stock Exchange (NEPSE), regulated by the Securities Board of Nepal (SEBON).
Below is a strategic comparison designed specifically for foreign investors.
| Criteria | Private Company in Nepal | Public Company in Nepal |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum shareholders | 1 | 7 |
| Maximum shareholders | 101 | Unlimited |
| Public share offering | Not allowed | Allowed |
| Capital raising | Private funding | IPO and public market |
| Compliance burden | Moderate | High |
| Disclosure | Limited | Extensive |
| Governance structure | Flexible | Formal board committees |
| Suitability for FDI | Very common | Used for scale-stage expansion |
For most foreign companies entering Nepal for trade, services, or manufacturing, a private limited company is the preferred starting point. A public company is typically considered when:
Nepal’s geography offers proximity to India and China. It benefits from:
When evaluating Private vs public company in Nepal, foreign companies should align structure with trade intent.
Market entry + controlled scaling → Private company
Capital market expansion + brand positioning → Public company
Structure must follow strategy.
Foreign companies must comply with:
Compliance intensity is materially higher for public companies.
One of the biggest differences in the Private vs public company in Nepal debate is capital access.
For trade-driven FDI projects, early-stage capital rarely requires public listing. Most foreign entrants rely on equity injection and controlled funding rounds.
Foreign companies typically prioritize control.
If control retention is critical, private structure offers greater flexibility.
Under the Income Tax Act 2058 (2002):
Tax treatment does not differ significantly between private and public companies. However, public companies face additional compliance costs and audit scrutiny.
Dividends distributed to foreign shareholders are subject to withholding tax as per prevailing law.
Most foreign investors entering Nepal for:
Choose private limited companies.
This structure aligns well with market-entry strategies.
A public company structure becomes relevant if:
Large hydropower projects often adopt public structures. Infrastructure projects sometimes follow similar models.
Use this simplified decision model:
For most trade-based FDI, private wins.
Public companies face:
Private companies face:
Foreign investors must balance liquidity with control.
Nepal offers:
Selecting the right structure enables you to fully leverage these advantages.
Private companies allow rapid operational launch. Public companies enable broader capital mobilization.
Objective: Back-office + regional support center
Capital need: Moderate
IPO plan: No
Best structure: Private limited company
Objective: Hydropower project
Capital need: High
IPO plan: Yes
Best structure: Public limited company
Yes, subject to sector restrictions under FITTA 2019. Many sectors allow 100% foreign ownership. Approval from the Department of Industry is required.
No. Most foreign investors use private limited companies. Public structure is optional unless sector-specific laws require otherwise.
Private companies have no high statutory minimum. Public companies must meet prescribed paid-up capital thresholds.
Yes. Public companies face stricter reporting, governance, and disclosure requirements under SEBON regulations.
Yes. Conversion is allowed under the Companies Act, subject to compliance and regulatory approval.