If you are evaluating Private vs public company in Nepal, you are already thinking strategically. Structure determines ownership control, compliance exposure, tax planning, and even intellectual property (IP) protection.
For foreign companies entering Nepal, the choice between a private limited company and a public limited company is not just legal. It shapes risk, scalability, investor access, and regulatory obligations under the Companies Act 2006, Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer Act 2019, and Income Tax Act 2002.
In this guide, we break down the structural, regulatory, tax, and IP implications. You will gain clarity. More importantly, you will understand which structure protects your capital and intellectual property in Nepal.
Company incorporation in Nepal is governed primarily by:
For foreign investors, FITTA approval is mandatory before capital injection. Company registration follows OCR procedures. Tax registration (PAN/VAT) then proceeds under the Inland Revenue Department.
Your entity choice affects:
A private limited company is the most common vehicle for foreign direct investment (FDI).
Under Section 2 of the Companies Act 2006, private companies cannot invite the public to subscribe to shares.
Foreign investors typically choose private companies because:
This structure is ideal for wholly owned subsidiaries.
A public limited company allows capital raising from the public.
Public companies intending to list must comply with securities regulations under the Securities Board of Nepal.
Public companies are subject to stricter transparency and reporting rules.
Below is a strategic comparison for foreign investors.
| Factor | Private Company | Public Company |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum shareholders | 1 | 7 |
| Maximum shareholders | 101 | Unlimited |
| Public share offering | Not allowed | Allowed |
| Compliance burden | Moderate | High |
| Governance structure | Flexible | Structured board required |
| Capital raising | Private placement | IPO and public market |
| Disclosure requirements | Limited | Extensive |
| Ideal for FDI | Yes | Rare for initial entry |
| IP protection strategy | Easier to centralize | Requires shareholder clarity |
| Regulatory supervision | OCR | OCR + SEBON |
Strategic Insight:
For 90% of foreign market entries, private companies offer better risk containment.
Nepal’s IP framework operates under the Patent, Design and Trademark Act 1965.
IP registration is handled by the Department of Industry.
When registering:
The company name becomes the IP holder.
If structured poorly:
Private companies allow tighter control of IP flow-back to the parent company.
Nepal does not impose a blanket minimum capital requirement for private companies. However:
Under the Income Tax Act 2002:
Public companies often incur higher compliance costs due to mandatory audits and reporting.
Compliance risk increases significantly with public status.
Choose a private company if you:
This applies to:
A public company may be strategic if:
However, foreign entrants rarely begin with a public structure.
Before choosing your structure, assess:
Private companies provide stronger risk containment.
Public companies provide capital expansion flexibility.
Under the Income Tax Act 2002:
Private companies allow simpler structuring of management fees and technical service payments.
Public companies face greater scrutiny on related-party transactions.
| Cost Factor | Private Company | Public Company |
|---|---|---|
| Registration | Lower | Higher |
| Annual filing | Moderate | High |
| Audit scope | Standard | Enhanced |
| Governance advisory | Minimal | Significant |
| Securities compliance | None | Mandatory |
Public company compliance can cost 2–3 times more annually.
Avoid these errors by planning structure before capital injection.
Yes. FITTA allows 100% foreign ownership in most sectors, subject to negative list restrictions.
No general minimum exists. However, FDI approval may require sector-specific thresholds.
Yes. Conversion is permitted under the Companies Act 2006, subject to compliance.
Private companies typically offer stronger centralized control over IP ownership.
No. Corporate tax rates generally remain the same unless sector incentives apply.
When evaluating Private vs public company in Nepal, foreign companies should prioritize control, risk management, and IP protection.
For most foreign investors, a private limited company offers:
Public companies are suitable for capital-intensive expansion phases.
Choosing the right structure at entry determines long-term success in Nepal.