If you are evaluating Private vs public company in Nepal, you are already thinking strategically.
Your company structure determines tax exposure, compliance burden, fundraising flexibility, and long-term exit options. It also affects how regulators such as the Office of Company Registrar and the Department of Industry review your investment.
Nepal is positioning itself as an emerging South Asian investment destination. GDP growth has averaged around 4–5% in recent years, with strong remittance inflows and infrastructure expansion. The legal framework is governed primarily by the Companies Act, 2063 (2006) and the Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer Act, 2019 (FITTA).
In this guide, you will learn:
Let’s break it down clearly and practically.
Before comparing structures, foreign investors must understand Nepal’s regulatory environment.
Key legislation includes:
Foreign investment approval is typically processed through the Department of Industry for most sectors.
Minimum FDI threshold under FITTA is NPR 20 million per investor.
This is where strategic decisions begin.
Private Company:
Public Company:
Private companies are controlled entities. Public companies are capital market vehicles.
Under the Companies Act:
Public companies must comply with SEBON and listing requirements if publicly offered.
Private company:
Public company:
Public structures are transparency-driven. Private structures are control-driven.
Below is a simplified strategic comparison:
| Criteria | Private Company in Nepal | Public Company in Nepal |
|---|---|---|
| Shareholder Limit | 1–101 | Minimum 7, no upper limit |
| Public Share Offering | Not allowed | Allowed |
| Governance Complexity | Moderate | High |
| Reporting to SEBON | Not required | Required if listed |
| FDI Suitability | Highly suitable | Suitable for large capital raising |
| Control Retention | Strong | Diluted over time |
| Exit Strategy | Share transfer | IPO / secondary market |
Strategic Insight:
For 90% of foreign SMEs entering Nepal, a private company structure is more efficient and lower risk.
Under FITTA 2019:
Private companies simplify this process.
Public companies introduce additional regulatory layers.
Under the Income Tax Act, 2002:
Tax treatment does not differ significantly between private and public companies.
However:
If your objective is operational efficiency, private companies are leaner.
A private company is ideal when:
Most foreign subsidiaries, branch conversions, and joint ventures begin as private companies.
A public company makes sense when:
Public structure is strategic, not default.
Foreign investors often overlook risk layers.
Consider these four dimensions:
Private companies reduce governance exposure and complexity.
Public companies increase transparency but limit control.
Ask yourself:
If most answers favor control and efficiency, choose private.
Myth 1: Public companies are required for foreign investors.
False. Private companies are widely used by FDI entities.
Myth 2: Public companies offer tax advantages.
False. Corporate tax rates are largely identical.
Myth 3: Private companies limit future expansion.
False. You can convert from private to public later.
Conversion is permitted under the Companies Act.
Scenario:
An Indian textile manufacturer plans to establish a production unit in Nepal.
Strategic path:
This staged approach reduces regulatory exposure.
If your business scales, conversion is possible.
Requirements include:
Conversion should be driven by strategy, not prestige.
Early regulatory mapping prevents delays.
Yes. FITTA 2019 allows 100% foreign ownership in most permitted sectors. Certain restricted sectors require local participation or are prohibited.
The Companies Act does not mandate a fixed minimum capital for private companies. However, FITTA requires minimum foreign investment of NPR 20 million per investor.
Not necessarily. Many large infrastructure projects operate as private companies. Public structure is required mainly for capital market participation.
Yes. The Companies Act permits conversion subject to shareholder approval and regulatory compliance.
Repatriation rules apply equally. However, private companies generally face fewer governance layers during dividend approvals.
When evaluating Private vs public company in Nepal, the right answer depends on your capital strategy and governance appetite.
For most foreign companies entering Nepal in 2026:
Public companies are powerful tools for scale, but they require readiness for transparency and capital market discipline.
If you are serious about entering Nepal, structure comes first. Everything else follows.