If you are evaluating Private vs public company in Nepal, you are already making one of the most important strategic decisions in your market entry journey.
For foreign companies, the legal structure you choose determines ownership flexibility, capital raising ability, compliance exposure, and long-term scalability. It also affects foreign investment approvals under the Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer Act and corporate governance obligations under the Companies Act.
Nepal’s investment framework has evolved significantly in recent years. The government has prioritized FDI, industrial expansion, and export-oriented manufacturing under the Industrial Enterprises Act.
But structure still matters.
In this comprehensive guide, we break down:
Let’s begin with clarity.
Under the Companies Act, companies in Nepal are primarily categorized as:
Both are separate legal entities.
Both offer limited liability protection.
But their governance structure and regulatory exposure differ significantly.
A Private Limited Company is the most common structure for:
Under Section 2 of the Companies Act 2006:
For most foreign investors entering Nepal, private companies provide:
If you are setting up a wholly owned subsidiary under FITTA 2019, a private company is typically the default structure.
A Public Limited Company is structured for:
Under the Companies Act 2006:
If listed, the company must comply with the rules of Nepal Stock Exchange.
| Criteria | Private Limited Company | Public Limited Company |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Shareholders | 1 | 7 |
| Maximum Shareholders | 101 | Unlimited |
| Public Share Offering | Not allowed | Allowed |
| IPO Eligibility | No | Yes |
| Compliance Burden | Moderate | High |
| Disclosure Requirements | Limited | Extensive |
| Foreign Ownership | Allowed (with DOI approval) | Allowed (with regulatory compliance) |
| Governance Structure | Flexible | Strict board structure required |
| Best For | FDI subsidiaries, SMEs | Large capital-intensive ventures |
Strategic Insight:
If your objective is operational control and cost efficiency, choose private.
If your objective is capital market access and scale, consider public.
Regardless of structure, incorporation involves regulatory coordination.
Apply through the Office of Company Registrar (OCR).
Submit proposal under FITTA 2019 to the Department of Industry (DOI).
Register at the Office of Company Registrar.
Nepal does not prescribe a uniform minimum capital for all companies.
However:
When deciding private vs public company in Nepal, ask:
If the answer to most is “no,” private is usually optimal.
Under the Income Tax Act:
There is no separate corporate tax regime for private vs public companies.
However, listed public companies may enjoy certain investor perception advantages.
For foreign investors concerned with regulatory risk, private companies offer lower compliance exposure.
Public companies make sense when:
Otherwise, private is structurally more efficient.
In boardroom discussions, the debate about private vs public company in Nepal often ignores hidden risks:
Public companies operate under higher scrutiny.
Private companies provide stronger control architecture.
For most foreign companies entering Nepal:
Structure should align with long-term capital strategy, not short-term cost.
Yes. 100% foreign ownership is permitted in most sectors under FITTA 2019, subject to approval and sectoral restrictions.
General companies have no universal minimum. Sector regulators may impose thresholds.
Yes. Conversion is permitted under the Companies Act 2006, subject to shareholder approval and regulatory compliance.
No. Both are taxed under the Income Tax Act 2002 at applicable corporate rates.
Private companies are simpler, faster, and involve lower regulatory reporting.
Choosing between private vs public company in Nepal is not just a legal step.
It is a capital strategy decision.
It defines your governance model.
It influences investor perception.
It determines compliance exposure.
For most foreign companies, a private limited company offers optimal control, flexibility, and lower risk during initial entry.
Public companies are powerful tools for capital expansion but require strong governance discipline.
If you are entering Nepal, structure your investment intentionally.