If you are a foreign company exploring South Asia, private vs public company in Nepal is one of the first strategic decisions you must make. The choice affects ownership, compliance burden, capital raising, and long-term scalability.
Nepal welcomes foreign investment, but its corporate framework is rules-driven. Selecting the wrong structure can slow approvals, restrict funding, or increase regulatory risk. This guide explains everything clearly, practically, and from a foreign investor’s perspective.
Company incorporation in Nepal is governed primarily by the Companies Act 2006 and administered by the Office of the Company Registrar.
Foreign investors must also comply with:
Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer Act 2019
Industrial Enterprises Act 2020
Income Tax Act 2002 and sector-specific regulations
Nepal recognizes two main company types:
Private Limited Company
Public Limited Company
A private limited company is the most common entry vehicle for foreign companies.
Minimum shareholders: 1
Maximum shareholders: 101
Share transfer restrictions apply
Cannot invite the public to subscribe for shares
Lower disclosure and compliance burden
Faster incorporation timelines
Easier FDI approval
Full control over ownership
Lower audit and reporting costs
This structure is ideal for:
Market entry
Offshore teams
Subsidiaries
Service and technology companies
A public limited company is designed for large-scale operations and capital markets.
Minimum shareholders: 7
No maximum shareholder limit
Shares are freely transferable
Can raise capital from the public
Subject to stricter governance
Infrastructure projects
Banking and financial institutions
Telecom and hydropower ventures
IPO-driven growth strategies
| Factor | Private Company | Public Company |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum shareholders | 1 | 7 |
| Maximum shareholders | 101 | Unlimited |
| Capital raising | Private only | Public + private |
| Compliance level | Moderate | High |
| Annual disclosures | Limited | Extensive |
| Foreign control | Flexible | More regulated |
| Setup timeline | Faster | Longer |
| Best for | Market entry, subsidiaries | Large-scale projects |
Insight:
Over 85% of foreign-owned companies in Nepal start as private limited entities, according to OCR registration trends.
Ask:
Are you testing the market or scaling aggressively?
Will you need public capital in Nepal?
Is operational control critical?
Public companies face:
Mandatory board committees
Higher audit scrutiny
Public disclosure obligations
Private companies offer regulatory agility.
Private companies can later convert into public companies. The reverse is not possible.
Annual financial statements
Statutory audit
Annual return filing
Quarterly disclosures
Independent directors
Enhanced corporate governance reporting
SEBON oversight for capital markets
Under FITTA 2019:
Both private and public companies can receive FDI
Sector caps may apply
Repatriation rules remain identical
However:
FDI approval is faster for private companies
Public companies face additional scrutiny on share issuance
Both structures are taxed identically:
Corporate tax: generally 25%
Withholding taxes apply
VAT registration if applicable
Tax complexity increases with public shareholding and cross-border dividends.
Full ownership control
Lower compliance cost
Faster setup
Limited fundraising options
Share transfer restrictions
Access to public capital
Strong credibility
Heavy compliance
Reduced flexibility
Choosing public status too early
Underestimating compliance costs
Ignoring sector-specific FDI caps
Structuring without exit planning
Yes. Most foreign companies choose private entities due to flexibility, speed, and control.
Yes, in approved sectors, subject to FITTA and sector regulations.
Yes. Conversion is legally permitted with regulatory approval.
Only in regulated sectors like banking or securities.
Private companies have significantly lower compliance and governance costs.