Foreign investors evaluating private vs public company in Nepal often focus on tax rates or setup time. But the real decision goes deeper. It affects capital strategy, governance, compliance exposure, and long-term exit options.
Nepal is positioning itself as a competitive South Asian investment destination. The legal framework has matured. Regulatory clarity has improved. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) approvals are increasingly streamlined through the Department of Industry and Investment Board Nepal.
If you are entering Nepal for trade, services, manufacturing, IT, or outsourcing, your choice of entity structure will shape your risk profile and scalability.
This guide gives you a clear, strategic, and legally grounded answer.
Foreign Direct Investment in Nepal is governed primarily by:
Your structure affects:
Choosing correctly at the beginning avoids costly restructuring later.
Under the Companies Act 2006, companies are broadly classified as:
Both can receive FDI approval. But they operate differently.
Let’s break it down.
| Criteria | Private Limited Company | Public Limited Company |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Shareholders | 1 | 7 |
| Maximum Shareholders | 101 | Unlimited |
| Public Share Offering | Not allowed | Allowed |
| Share Transfer | Restricted | Freely transferable |
| Regulatory Burden | Moderate | High |
| Listing on NEPSE | Not permitted | Permitted |
| Ideal For | Controlled FDI operations | Large capital projects |
This comparison reflects Companies Act 2006 requirements and Securities Board of Nepal (SEBON) regulations.
More than 90% of foreign investors entering Nepal choose a private limited structure.
Here’s why:
Choose this model if:
For most service-based FDI models, including IT outsourcing, manufacturing, and back-office operations, private companies are optimal.
Public companies are suitable for scale.
Public structures are common in hydropower, infrastructure, and large industrial ventures.
Regardless of private vs public company in Nepal, the FDI process generally follows these steps:
FDI minimum threshold under FITTA 2019 is NPR 20 million (subject to sectoral classification).
Corporate income tax in Nepal is generally:
Dividend tax: 5% withholding (final tax).
Capital gains tax applies on share transfer.
Private vs public company does not significantly change tax rate. However, public companies face higher compliance scrutiny.
Compliance cost difference can be substantial.
For smaller FDI projects, public status creates unnecessary burden.
If your strategy includes:
A public company structure may be justified.
Otherwise, private limited companies offer stronger operational efficiency.
Use this decision matrix:
Nepal’s regulatory system is improving. But public companies face tighter scrutiny.
NRB approval is required for dividend repatriation. Proper documentation is essential.
Certain sectors remain restricted under FITTA schedules.
In practice:
Private entities dominate because control and simplicity matter.
There is no universal answer.
But for most foreign direct investors entering Nepal for:
A private limited company is structurally superior.
Public companies are strategic financing tools, not operational defaults.
Yes. FITTA 2019 allows 100% foreign ownership in permitted sectors. Certain industries remain restricted.
No. FDI can be structured through private limited companies.
The minimum FDI threshold is NPR 20 million, subject to sector rules.
Yes. Conversion is allowed under the Companies Act 2006, subject to regulatory approval.
Both allow repatriation. Compliance quality matters more than structure.
When analyzing private vs public company in Nepal, the decision is not about prestige. It is about strategic alignment.
Private companies provide control, efficiency, and lower compliance exposure.
Public companies provide capital scalability and market access.
Foreign investors should align structure with:
Nepal offers significant opportunity. But structure determines sustainability.
If you are evaluating FDI entry into Nepal and need tailored structuring guidance, strategic tax alignment, or regulatory risk mapping, professional advisory support is essential.
The right entity structure is not just legal compliance. It is competitive positioning