When foreign investors compare a private vs public company in Nepal, they usually focus on ownership, capital, and compliance.
But many overlook a critical layer: intellectual property protection under the Patent, Design and Trade Mark Act 1965.
If your business model depends on brand, technology, product design, or proprietary systems, your company structure and IP strategy must align from day one.
This guide explains how the Patent, Design, and Trade Mark Act affects private and public companies differently, and what foreign companies must consider before entering Nepal.
Before choosing between a private and public company, investors must understand Nepal’s regulatory foundation.
Key governing laws include:
Each law affects ownership rights, IP protection, foreign equity, and compliance exposure.
For foreign companies, structure is not just administrative.
It determines brand protection, licensing flexibility, and long-term scalability.
Under the Companies Act 2006, companies in Nepal are primarily categorized as:
A private company:
Most foreign investors choose this route.
A public company:
Public companies are regulated more heavily.
They often prepare for listing or public capital raising.
The Patent, Design, and Trade Mark Act 1965 governs:
IP is administered by the Department of Industry (DOI).
Your company type determines:
For example:
| Factor | Private Company | Public Company |
|---|---|---|
| Share Transfer | Restricted | Freely transferable |
| Public Disclosure | Limited | Extensive |
| Brand Risk Exposure | Lower | Higher |
| IP Licensing Flexibility | High | Moderate |
| Regulatory Scrutiny | Moderate | High |
| Suitable for Foreign Tech Firms | Yes | Case-specific |
Insight:
If your competitive edge depends on proprietary systems, a private company structure often offers stronger control over intellectual assets.
Under the Patent, Design, and Trade Mark Act 1965:
Unregistered marks have weak enforcement standing.
Foreign investors must file locally in Nepal.
International registrations do not automatically apply.
Patents protect:
Design protection applies to:
However, Nepal follows a registration-based system.
Protection is not automatic.
This is crucial for:
Under FITTA 2019:
Foreign investors may:
But IP ownership must align with company structure.
For example:
Improper structuring can delay repatriation.
A private company is ideal when:
This is common for:
A public company may be appropriate if:
However, public disclosure requirements increase IP exposure risks.
Here is a simplified roadmap:
This process typically takes several months.
Delays often occur due to documentation gaps.
Many investors focus only on incorporation.
But risks include:
These mistakes can lead to:
Choosing between a private vs public company in Nepal should not happen in isolation.
Your decision impacts:
For foreign companies, a misaligned structure increases compliance risk.
The Patent, Design, and Trade Mark Act provides remedies including:
However, enforcement can be procedural.
Proper registration is essential.
According to Nepal’s Companies Act 2006 and DOI guidelines:
Foreign investors entering Nepal’s growing market must integrate legal compliance with structural planning.
This guide is based on current legislation including:
Always consult a qualified advisor before filing.
In most cases, yes. A private company offers tighter ownership control and lower disclosure obligations. It is usually preferred for subsidiaries and IP-intensive businesses.
No. Nepal is not fully integrated with automatic international trademark systems. Local filing is required for enforceable protection.
Seven years from registration. It can be renewed indefinitely upon payment of renewal fees.
Yes, but licensing agreements must comply with FITTA and may require regulatory approval for royalty repatriation.
Enforcement becomes difficult. The business risks losing exclusive rights within Nepal.
When evaluating a private vs public company in Nepal, foreign companies must go beyond incorporation costs.
The Patent, Design, and Trade Mark Act 1965 significantly influences brand security, technology protection, and long-term control.
For most foreign investors, a private company structure offers stronger IP governance and operational flexibility.
If you are planning entry into Nepal, structure and IP must be designed together.