If you are comparing Private vs public company in Nepal, intellectual property protection should be part of your decision. Copyrights and patents shape valuation, investor confidence, and long-term scalability.
Foreign companies entering Nepal often focus on tax and compliance. Yet IP protection under Nepalese law can determine whether your technology, brand, or creative assets remain secure.
In this legal perspective, we explain how Nepal protects copyrights and patents, how the structure of a private or public company affects IP ownership, and what foreign investors must know before entering the market.
We reference Nepal’s governing laws, including the Patent, Design and Trade Mark Act and the Copyright Act, along with regulatory oversight by the Department of Industry.
Let’s break it down clearly.
Nepal’s IP system is primarily governed by:
Nepal is also a member of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). However, its domestic framework remains registration-based and administratively driven.
When choosing between a private and public company structure:
A public company may attract institutional investors.
A private company offers tighter IP control.
Copyright protects original literary, artistic, musical, software, and audiovisual works.
Under the Copyright Act 2002:
Foreign companies operating in Nepal must ensure:
Failure to formalize ownership can create disputes during due diligence.
Patents protect inventions that are:
Under the Patent, Design and Trade Mark Act 1965:
Nepal follows a strict filing requirement. If you disclose before filing, you risk losing protection.
When evaluating Private vs public company in Nepal, IP governance becomes critical.
Governed under the Companies Act.
IP Advantage:
Confidentiality and tighter asset control.
Also governed by the Companies Act 2006.
IP Consideration:
More transparency required during public offerings.
Patent portfolios may be scrutinized by investors.
| Criteria | Private Company | Public Company |
|---|---|---|
| Shareholder Limit | Up to 101 | Unlimited |
| Capital Raising | Private funding | Public share issue |
| IP Disclosure | Limited | Mandatory disclosures |
| Investor Due Diligence | Moderate | Extensive |
| Control of Licensing | Founder-driven | Board governed |
| Risk of Hostile Takeover | Low | Higher |
Insight:
If your core value lies in proprietary technology, a private structure often provides stronger control during early expansion.
The process involves:
Processing time varies. Administrative backlog may occur.
When entering Nepal:
They do not.
Nepal requires local registration.
Before choosing a structure:
This becomes essential during FDI approval under Nepal’s foreign investment regime.
Investors examine:
A public company listing requires higher scrutiny.
Private companies may delay disclosure but face similar investor questions during funding rounds.
Enforcement includes:
Nepal’s IP enforcement system is evolving.
Foreign companies should maintain documentation.
Royalty payments are subject to withholding tax under Nepal’s Income Tax Act 2002.
Foreign entities should:
If you prioritize:
Your IP strategy must align with your corporate structure.
No. Foreign patents are not automatically valid in Nepal. Separate local registration is required.
It lasts for the author’s lifetime plus 50 years under the Copyright Act 2002.
Yes. Foreign entities can register patents through authorized local representatives.
Yes. Material IP assets must be disclosed during public offerings and financial reporting.
Most tech startups prefer private companies for tighter IP control and simplified governance.